NAND LAL AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/29943/2026 · 2026-10-05
Kunal Ravi Singh, Siddhartha Varma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13898 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13898 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29943 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Sri Jai Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, appeared and submitted that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous due to the efflux of time. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
2. This order was passed in the presence of Sri Abhijeet Chaterjee, Advocate, holding brief for Sri Diptiman Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.4. October 6, 2026 vijay krishna Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jai Singh, Nitish Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Diptiman Singh, Ashish Mishra, C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Nand Lal And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIJAY KRISHNA JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad