- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8278 MFA No. 3740 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3740 OF 2017 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT N SUGUNA W/O DR H M SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, RESIDING AT TEJU KIRAN NILAYA, NO. 343, 5TH CROSS, RAMMURTHY NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 016. 2. SMT. N USHA W/O SRI K R SURESH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 4166, HAL 2ND STAGE, 13TH A MAIN, INDIRANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 008. 3. SMT. S TULASI W/O SRI K K RAMA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 68, 5TH TEMPLE STREET, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003. 4. SMT. PAVITHRA W/O SRI D.S.SRINATH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 3128, 6TH C MAIN, NEAR ESI HOSPITAL, HAL 2ND STAGE, INDIRANAGAR BENGALURU - 560 038. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8278 MFA No. 3740 of 2017 5. SMT. S THRIPURA W/O SRI K N KESHAVA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO. 24, 1ST A CROSS, 5TH MAIN, 2ND STAGE, DOMLUR, BENGALURU - 560 071. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. V.BALAKRISHNA, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI S UDAYA REDDY S/O LATE R SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 100/2, SAI NIVAS, 8TH CROSS, DOMLUR, BENGALURU - 560 071. 2. SRI S PULIKESHI REDDY S/O LATE SRINIVASA REDDY R AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO. 101/2, 9TH CROSS, PATEL LANE, DOMLUR, BENGALURU - 560 071. 3. SRI S HARIHARA REDDY S/O LATE R SRINIVASA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO. 104, 9TH CROSS, PATEL LANE, DOMLUR, BENGALURU - 560 071. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.R.LAKSHMIPATHI REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. S.S.HAVERI, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2 AND R3) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 104 READ WITH ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8278 MFA No. 3740 of 2017 THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED AS UNDER: ORAL JUDGMENT Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. 2. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 10.02.2026, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellants it was ordered to be listed on 11.02.2026 and it was also made clear that if none appears for the appellants on the next date of hearing, the appeal would be dismissed for non-prosecution. 3 As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8278 MFA No. 3740 of 2017 Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23