- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 943 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 123 OF 2026 GAJANAN VYANKATRAO BHARAI VERSUS ANITA GAJANAN BHARATI AND ANOTHER Mr.S.V.Suryawanshi h/f Mr.V.D.Patnurkar, Advocate for the Applicant. ( CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. ) DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the Applicant. 2. The Applicant/husband is challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 20.02.2026 passed by the learned Family Court, Nanded in Petition No.E-161/2024. Vide impugned order, the learned Family Court was pleased to direct the Applicant herein to pay the interim maintenance of Rs.12,000/- p.m. to the Respondent No.1/wife and Rs.8,000/- p.m. to Respondent No.2/daughter. 3. At the outset, upon specific query as regards salary and occupation of the Applicant, the learned Advocate for the Applicant khs/Sept.2026/123 - 2 - states that the Applicant is a Police Inspector. 4. In view of the matrimonial dispute between the parties, the Respondent wife is staying separately alongwith Respondent No.2/daughter. Therefore, the proceedings are before the Family Court at the behest of of Respondent/wife. The learned Family Court, vide it’s interim order dated 20.02.2026, granted interim maintenance of Rs.20,000/- in favour of the Respondents. 5. As regards the salary of the husband, there is a reference in paragraph no.10 of the impugned order that the Applicant / Husband is earning more than Rs.60,000/-. Hence the impugned order thereby directing the Applicant of paying an amount of Rs.20,000/- towards the Respondent/wife and daughter is quite reasonable. 6. In that view of the matter, as no valid and strong grounds are raised in the instant Criminal Revision Application, there is no merit in the application. Hence the instant Criminal Revision Application is dismissed. No order as to costs. ( SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.) khs/Sept.2026/123