(1) 911- C. P. 473-2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 473 OF 2019 IN WP/7984/2018 SHEHNAAZBI SHAIKH SALIM AND ANOTHER VERSUS SHAIKH YUNUS SHAIKH AHMED AND OTHERS ….. Advocate for the Petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 : Mr. B. B. Kulkarni AGP for Respondents: Mr. A. S. Shinde …... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.J. DATED : SEPTEMBER 29, 2026 ORDER:- 1. Heard. 2. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to take instructions, but the record shows that present Contempt Petition is in respect of the flouting of the interim orders, restraining the mutation in respect of the property in dispute. 3. According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, despite such prohibition, the concerned authority made mutation in the Property Card of the disputed property. However, the learned A.G.P. as well as learned counsel for the petitioner confirms the fact that the main Writ Petition No. 7984 of 2018 has been finally decided and dismissed with liberty to the petitioner for challenging the order dated 05.12.2015 (2) 911- C. P. 473-2019.odt passed by the Dy. Superintendent of Land Record, Jalna before the competent forum as permissible under law. 4. As such, when the main Writ Petition is dismissed and that too with the liberty as aforesaid, the petitioner is having remedy against the mutation carried out during the pendency of Writ Petition. 5. Under such circumstances, nothing survives in this petition and it stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE YSK/