Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13889 (ALL)

SALEEM SHAH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14525/2026 · 2026-10-05

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14525 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record on Board. 2. This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs:- "(I) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authorities to release the retiral dues of the petitioner like G.P.F., Pension along with arrears, Gratuity, Leave encashment, Group Insurance & arrears of Dearness Allowance etc. along with interest @ 12% per annum to the petitioner; (II) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents authorities to decide and pass order on the representation of the petitioner dated 04.08.2026 (Annexure No. 2 to the Writ Petition) within stipulated period at an early date as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has contended that the grievance of the petitioner regarding non-payment of retiral dues, as raised in the instant writ petition, can be more appropriately redressed by the Executive Engineer, Construction Division, U.P. Jal Nigam (Urban), Bareilly (respondent no.3) and that he has no objection if a direction is issued for expeditious disposal of a fresh representation, to be moved by the present petitioner, within such stipulated period, as may be directed by this Court. 4. In this conspectus, as above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this matter pending; therefore, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition, without making any observation on the merits of the case, with liberty to the present petitioner to move a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Abhinav Shukla, C.S.C., Suresh Singh Saleem Shah .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) fresh representation with respect to his grievances, as raised in this petition, within a period of three weeks from today, along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition before the respondent no.3, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law after considering the medical condition of the petitioner and his wife, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of the same. 5. With the aforesaid direction, instant writ petition stands finally disposed of. October 6, 2026 VR WRIA No. 14525 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIBHA RATAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad