Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13888 (MAD)

M/s. Soundaraja Mills Ltd v. M/s.Nimbark Fashions Limited

A/1306/2026 · 2026-04-07

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

A No. 1306 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 07-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY A No. 1306 of 2026 M/s. Soundaraja Mills Ltd Rep by its M.D.Mr.Kiran Ranjit Soundarajan, Soundararaja Buildings, G.T.N.Salai, Dindigul - 624 005. ..Applicant(s) Vs M/s.Nimbark Fashions Limited Rep by its Authorised Signatory, Mr.Manish Bang, No.1006, Windfall, Sahar Plaza, J.B.Nagar, Andheri Kurla Road, Andheri East, Mumbai - 400 059. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: To grant extension of Arbitration in respect of dispute which arose out of the Buy Back Agreement dated 01.07.2021 for a further period of 1 month from the date of this order. For Applicant(s): Mr.R.Ramkumar ORDER The respondent before the arbitral tribunal has applied for extension of the mandate of the arbitral tribunal. In terms of order dated 17.03.2026, after despatching private notice, the applicant has filed affidavit of service dated 02.04.2026 stating that notice was delivered on the sole respondent on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A No. 1306 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 2 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA 20.03.2026. The tracking report enclosed with the affidavit corroborates the statement. In spite of service of notice, there is no representation for the respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that arguments were concluded, but that the award could not be pronounced because the dispute requires verification of accounts and mathematical calculation. 3. Considering the stage of arbitral proceedings, the mandate of the arbitral tribunal is extended by a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 07-04-2026 RNA A No. 1306 of 2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis