Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13881 (KAR)

SMT. SOWJANYA N S v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/22188/2025 · 2026-02-11

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8263 WP No. 22188 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 22188 OF 2025 (S-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SMT. SOWJANYA N.S. W/O LATE SANTHOSH J., AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, NO.158, 7TH CROSS, 3RD STAGE, NEAR CHAMUNDESHWARI TEMPLE, RAMABAINAGAR, MYSORE-570 008. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N. KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR THE KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, SHANTHI NAGARA, BENGALURU-560 027. 3. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER KARNATAKA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, MYSORE RURAL DIVISION, BANNIMANTAP, MYSORE-570 015. Digitally signed by MARKONAHALLI RAMU PRIYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8263 WP No. 22188 of 2025 4. SMT. MANGALAGOWRAMMA W/O LATE JALENDRA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT WARD NO.2, KUMVEMPUNAGARA, K.R. NAGARA TOWN, MYSORE DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. RAJAKUMAR, ADDITIONAL GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR R1; SMT. H.R. RENUKA, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3 ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO: DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO APPOINT THE PETITIONER ON COMPASSIONATE GROUNDS FORTHWITH BY CONSIDERING HER APPLICATION DATED 02.01.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-J; AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE ORAL ORDER This petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner on compassionate grounds by considering her application dated 02.01.2023. 2. An application (I.A.No.1/2026) is also filed to incorporate one more prayer seeking direction to the VI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8263 WP No. 22188 of 2025 Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mysuru, where the proceeding is pending in P & SC No.21/2023 to grant succession certificate. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that writ petition is originally filed seeking writ of mandamus to consider the petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment on the ground that her husband who was working in KSRTC has expired. 4. It is the contention that the application seeking compassionate appointment is pending for more than three years. It is also submitted that the respondent - Corporation has issued an endorsement to the petitioner to produce a succession certificate declaring petitioner's status as the wife of deceased - J. Santhosh. 5. It is further submitted that P & SC No.21/2023 is pending consideration before the VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mysuru. In the said proceeding, statement of objection is filed by the mother of the deceased and petitioner's status as wife of Santhosh is admitted. It is further stated that since the respondent - Corporation has issued an endorsement vide Annexure - D to obtain succession certificate, the application - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8263 WP No. 22188 of 2025 seeking appointment on compassionate ground is not considered on merit. Under these circumstances, it is submitted that a direction is to be issued to both the parties for co- operating with the Court for early disposal of the aforementioned proceeding. 6. Learned counsel for the respondent - Corporation would submit that, since the application for appointment on compassionate ground is filed along with a prayer to confer all monetary benefits on the petitioner, the Corporation is justified in issuing an endorsement insisting for a succession certificate. 7. The Court has considered the contentions raised at the Bar and perused the records. 8. Since the petitioner is claiming a compassionate appointment and also the disbursement of monetary benefits in her favour, the respondent - Corporation is justified in issuing an endorsement insisting for a succession certificate and accordingly, the petition is filed before the Trial Court. 9. It is noticed that the pleadings are complete. Though the prayer to issue a writ of mandamus to the Trial Court to dispose of the matter is not tenable, considering the - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8263 WP No. 22188 of 2025 fact that the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment is pending consideration since last three years and now same has to be considered in accordance with law, the Court can only request the Trial Court to expedite the adjudication and both the parties are directed to co-operate for early disposal of the proceeding before the VI Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mysuru. 10. It is made clear that the Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the claim of the petitioner or the contesting respondents before the Trial Court. 11. With these observations, I.A.No.1/2026 for amendment is allowed and the writ petition is disposed of. 12. The parties in P & SC No.21/2023 pending on the file of the VI Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Mysuru shall co-operate for early disposal. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE PMR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2