Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13878 (ALL)

SMT. RADHIKA DEVI v. MR. NAVEEN KUMAR

CAPL/6009/2026 · 2026-10-05

Piyush Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6009 of 2026 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. In pursuance of the earlier order, instructions have come which are taken on record. On the strength of the same, Mr. Pawan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel submits that the order passed by the writ Court has been duly complied with in its letter and spirit. Learned counsel for the applicant(s) does not dispute the aforesaid position and submits that he has no grievance with regard to compliance of the order. In view of the aforesaid admitted position, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. Consequently, no cause of action survives. Accordingly, the contempt application stands disposed of. The contempt application shall be consigned to the records. The notice, if any, stands discharged. However, liberty is granted to the applicant(s) to approach this Court by moving an appropriate application, in the event of non-compliance of the order by the opposite party(s) within a period of one month from today. October 6, 2026 Abhishek Gupta Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Upadhyay, Niraj Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Piyush Agrawal,J.) Smt. Radhika Devi .....Applicant(s) Mr. Naveen Kumar .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad