148 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-10260-2026 Date of decision: 23.04.2026 VINAY DUBEY ...PETITIONER V/S DHARAM SINGH ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Saurabh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. **** SUBHAS MEHLA, J. (ORAL) 1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of BNSS for quashing/ setting aside the impugned order Annexure P-7 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Chandigarh in in case bearing No. NACT-9063 of 2021 dated 23.11.2021 titled as “Dharam Singh Vs. Viney Dubey” vide which, petitioner has been declared a proclaimed person. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has surrendered before the trial Court and as such, he does not want to pursue the present petition, however, he wants to assail the order dated 24.02.2025 passed by the trial Court whereby half share of his property has been attached in order to procure his presence. 3. Heard. 4. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition stands disposed of with liberty to the petitioner SONIA PURI 2026.04.28 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-10260-2026 -2- to challenge the order regarding attachment of his property before an appropriate Forum, in accordance with law. (SUBHAS MEHLA) 23.04.2026 JUDGE Sonia Puri (i) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No (ii) Whether reportable Yes/No SONIA PURI 2026.04.28 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document