MOHIT KUMAR ALIAS BADAL KUMAR ALIAS MOHIT v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./9284/2025 · 2026-02-13
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13874 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13874 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:4168 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 9284 of 2025
------ Mohit Kumar @ Badal Kumar @ Mohit, son of Prasad Ram @ Ram Prasad Ram, resident of Village Harshnathpur, Simariya, P.O. Banhe, P.S. Simariya, District Chatra
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opp. Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedy, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P. ------
Order No.03 / Dated : 13.02.2026
Bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioner- Mohit Kumar @ Badal Kumar @ Mohit, who is in custody in connection with Special POCSO Case No.07 of 2025 arising out of Tandwa P.S. Case No. 274 of 2024 for the offence registered under Section 96 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases, Chatra, is pressed into motion.
Earlier bail application of this petitioner was rejected on merit and the present bail application is renewed on the ground that he is in custody since 04.11.2024 and out of ten witnesses, nine have been examined.
Learned A.P.P. opposed the bail petition.
Considering the stage of trial, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected. Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude it without any further delay, without giving any unnecessary adjournment to the prosecution.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit
Uploaded 16.02.2026