1 / 2 2026:CGHC:284 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 14103 of 2025 Rajendra Kumar Burman S/o Late Shri Purushottam Kumar Burman Aged About 64 Years Occupation - Retired Work Charged Driver, Department Of Power R/o - House No. 879, Chhattisgarh Housing Board Colony Sejbahar Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Power Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh Pin 492002 2 - Chief Electrical Inspector B - Block, Second Floor, Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar District - Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Atul Pandey, Advocate For State : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 05/01/2026 1. Default(s), as raised by the Registry has been over ruled. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who stood retired as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees is entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioner. Identical issue came up for ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.01.06 10:51:18 +0530 2 / 2 hearing before this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of C.G., in W.P.(S) No. 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioners have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time. 3. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner, at this stage, he is having no objection. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to make fresh representation. In the event, petitioner submit representation, his claim shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation keeping in mind decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 6. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observation and direction. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza