Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13864 (CHH)

ANIL KUMAR KASHYAP v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/328/2026 · 2026-01-13

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2026:CGHC:2217 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 328 of 2026 Anil Kumar Kashyap S/o Late Shri Rajaram Kashyap Aged About 43 Years Posted As Radiographer, R/o Near Mahamaya Mandir, Jarhagaon, Mungeli (C.G.) Tahsil And District- Mungeli (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Atal Nagar) Raipur (C.G.) Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Secretary, General Adiministration Department State Of Chhattisgarh Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Secretary, Public Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Atal Nagar) Raipur (C.G.) Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Upper Secretary, Public Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Atal Nagar) Raipur (C.G.) Tahsil And District- Raipur (C.G.) 5 - President State Transfer Coordination Committee General Administrative Department, State Of Chhattisgarh Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar District- Raipur (C.G.) ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.01.15 11:06:41 +0530 2 / 3 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Kusum Lalchandani, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. S.S. Tekchandani, Advocate For State : Mr. Yashwant SinghThakur, Additional Advocate General S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 14/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the transfer and representation of the petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ/order/command and direct the respondents to consider and decide your representation afresh, keeping in view of 80% mental disability of petitioner’s daughter, dependency of petitioner’s elderly mother and applicable transfer policy and disability laws within a fixed time frame. 10.3 Any other relief, including the cost of this petition, as it appears to be fit and appropriate to this Hon’ble Court. ” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is working as radiographer and while he was posted at District Hospital Mungeli he was transferred to Community Health Centre Tamnar, District-Raigarh. He submits that daughter of petitioner is mentally disabled and therefore, he is finding it difficult to comply with the order of transfer. Petitioner has already submitted a representation before the committee constituted under the Transfer Policy on 03.07.2025, however, till date no decision has been taken, therefore, direction be 3 / 3 issued to committee constituted under the Transfer Policy to take decision on pending representation within specified time frame. 3. Learned State counsel submits that in view of limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner to take decision on pending representation, he is having no objection. 4. On due consideration of the submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage directing the committee constituted under the Transfer Policy to take decision on representation submitted by petitioner on 03.07.2025, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 3 weeks from the date of receipt of order in an objective manner, taking pragmatic approach sympathetically. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza