Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13861 (JHR)

MD BHITIA ANSARI ALIAS SAKUT ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1339/2026 · 2026-03-30

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9262 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 1339 of 2026 ---- 1.Md. Bhitia Ansari @ Sakut Ansari, aged about 59 years, son of late Baribul Ansari 2.Betaka Tudu @ Kanhu Betaka Tudu, aged about 48 years, son of late Md. Godro Tudu 3.Rajawool Ansari @ Rijawool Ansari @ Rijwan Ansari, aged about 29 years, son of late Jafir Ansari, All residents of Masnian PO and PS Mirzachowki, District Sahebganj .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Agnivesh, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Sanjay Kr Srivastav, Advocate ---- 2/30.03.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioners and for State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Mirzachowki PS Case No.88 of 2025, for offence registered under section 145, 318(2), 61(2), 351(2), 115(2) and 126(2) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate at Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and the case has been lodged belatedly and in view of that, anticipatory bail may kindly be granted to the petitioners. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that serious allegations are there against the petitioners of alluring the 2026:JHHC:9262 2 husband of the informant to shift at Mumbai for labour work. He next submits that further allegations are made of human trafficking of the tribals by the petitioners along with the co-accused in the name of providing job. 5. In view of above and considering that it has come in the order of the learned Sessions Judge that in paragraph nos.15 and 16 of the case diary, the independent witnesses have supported the prosecution case and the allegations are there of human trafficking of tribals against the petitioners along with the other co-accused in the name of providing job, and in the attending facts and circumstances of the present case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, and hence, A.B.A. No.1339 of 2026 is, hereby, dismissed. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 30.03.2026 SI/