Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13858 (BOM)

PATEL BHAGYASHRI VIJAYKUMAR AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/12890/2026 · 2026-09-23

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 WP-12742-26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 12742 OF 2026 AHIRE RAMCHANDRA AMBAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. S. U. Choudhari a/w Mr. C. B. Choudhari, Advocate h/f Mr. Manoj R. Suryawanshi, Advocate For The Petitioner Mr. V. M. Kagne, AGP for respondents/State … WRIT PETITION NO. 12890 OF 2026 PATEL BHAGYASHRI VIJAYKUMAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. S. U. Choudhari a/w Mr. C. B. Choudhari, Advocate h/f Mr. Manoj R. Suryawanshi, Advocate For The Petitioner Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for respondents/State … WRIT PETITION NO. 12892 OF 2026 SURYAWANSHI JITENDRA LAXMAN AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. S. U. Choudhari a/w Mr. C. B. Choudhari, Advocate h/f Mr. Manoj R. Suryawanshi, Advocate For The Petitioner Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for respondents/State … WRIT PETITION NO. 12895 OF 2026 NITIN BANSILAL SAVALE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. S. U. Choudhari a/w Mr. C. B. Choudhari, Advocate h/f Mr. Manoj R. Suryawanshi, Advocate For The Petitioner Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for respondents/State … WRIT PETITION NO. 12900 OF 2026 BEHERE AMOL VISHWASRAO AND OTHERS VERSUS SVH 2026:BHC-AUG:44527-DB 2 WP-12742-26.odt THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. S. U. Choudhari a/w Mr. C. B. Choudhari, Advocate h/f Mr. Manoj R. Suryawanshi, Advocate For The Petitioner Mr. S. R. Wakle, AGP for respondents/State … WRIT PETITION NO. 12908 OF 2026 SURYAWANSHI NILESH JIVAN AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. S. U. Choudhari a/w Mr. C. B. Choudhari, Advocate h/f Mr. Manoj R. Suryawanshi, Advocate For The Petitioner Mr. A. B. Girase, GP for respondents/State … WRIT PETITION NO. 12909 OF 2026 BHATU AANANDA PAWAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. S. U. Choudhari a/w Mr. C. B. Choudhari, Advocate h/f Mr. Manoj R. Suryawanshi, Advocate For The Petitioner Mr. N. D. Batule, AGP for respondents/State … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2. By these writ petitions the petitioners seek directions to the respondents authorities to give benefits of Eksthar (one step pay - scale) since they are working in the Tribal and PESA areas, in terms of Government Resolution date 29.02.2024. 3. Learned advocate for petitioners submits that in the SVH 3 WP-12742-26.odt similarly circumstanced petitioners’ cases the Coordinate Bench of this Court in Writ Petition No.248 of 2026 and connected matters, by order dated 20.04.2026, has allowed the writ petitions. 4. Perusal of the said decision shows that the issue raised in these petitions is squarely covered by the said order. 5. Since the petitioners are similarly circumstanced like that of the petitioners in the said order, the petitions deserve to be allowed by giving same directions. 6. For the reasons stated in the said order, the writ petitions are allowed in the following terms : I. Respondent/Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, shall scrutinize the records of these Petitioners and the places at which they are deployed for performing their duties, within a period of 30 days from today, considering the Government Resolution dated 29.02.2024. II. The cases which have no legal impediment after verification, shall be cleared by the concerned Respondent and the salary benefits to which the Petitioners are entitled to, in the light of the one step pay-scale made available to the employees working in the Tribal and PESA areas, shall be paid to them along with arrears as well as their current salary, within a period of 30 days, thereafter. SVH 4 WP-12742-26.odt III. After scrutiny, if the Petitioners, on the basis of their record, are found to be ineligible, the concerned Respondent would issue notice to those Petitioners, so as to enable them to appear before the said authority and address it. IV. After such hearing, which shall be completed within 120 days, the concerned Respondent shall pass an appropriate order and grant benefits of one-step pay-scale to those candidates, who are found to be eligible. (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.) SVH