Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13856 (MAD)

S.THIYAGARAJAN v. The Commissioner Of Land Administration

WP/9563/2026 · 2026-03-13

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.9563 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.03.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.9563 of 2026 and W.M.P.No.10312 of 2026 S.Thiyagarajan S/o.Subramani, No.104, 2nd Street, Bharath Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Kolathur, Chennai-600 099 Petitioner Vs 1.The Commissioner of Land Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.-600 005 2.The District Collector Chennai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer RDO, Chennai. 4.The Tashildar Ayanavaram Taluk Office, Chennai District. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.9563 of 2026 5.Hussaini Begam, No.15, Pil Kilinton Road, Chennai-600 023 6.Malliga Begam, No.15, Pil Kilinton Road, Chennai-600 023 Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent/District Collector, Chennai to dispose the pending proceeding Letter in Na.Ka.No.A2/3448/2025 dated 13.11.2025 in a time bound manner. For Petitioner: Mr.R.Karunagaran For Respondents: Mr.E.Vijay Anand Addl. Government Pleader for R1 to R4 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard on admission. 2. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent/District Collector, Chennai, to dispose of the pending proceedings dated 13.11.2025 in a time bound manner. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.9563 of 2026 3. Learned State counsel submitted that it is the Revenue Divisional Officer, Central Chennai Revenue Division, Chennai District, who is the competent authority to consider the pending proceedings and, as such, by communication dated 4.12.2025, the District Revenue Officer, Chennai District requested the Revenue Divisional Officer, Central Chennai Revenue Division, Chennai District, to consider the same. The said communication is taken on record. 4. In view of the above, nothing survives for adjudication in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. However, the Revenue Divisional Officer, Central Chennai Revenue Division, Chennai District, is directed to take a final decision, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from today. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 13.03.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.9563 of 2026 To: 1.The Commissioner of Land Administration Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai.-600 005 2.The District Collector Chennai District. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer RDO, Chennai. 4.The Tashildar Ayanavaram Taluk Office, Chennai District. ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.9563 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. bbr W.P.No.9563 of 2026 13.03.2026 ______________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis