$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7080/2026 NITIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Himanshu Anand and Ms.Dharini Windlass, Advs with petitioner in person. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kapil Dutta, SC for MCD. Mr.Jivesh Kumar Tiwari, CGSC with Ms.Chhani Khandelwal, GP, Ms.Nandini Aggarwal and Ms.Samiksha, Advs for R-2. Mr. Manish Srivastava, Mr. Moksh Arora and Mr. Santosh Ramdurg, Advocates for R-3/BSES. Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel (Civil) for R4/GNCTD. Mr. Manu Sishodia and Ms. Hina Rajput, Advocates for R-5 to 8 & 12. SI Vivek Singh, PS DBG Road. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R % 29.07.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Pursuant to our earlier order, the petitioner, Mr.Nitin is present in Court. 3. We have been informed by learned Standing Counsel representing This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2026 at 11:32:41 respondent-MCD that respondent-MCD had passed four different orders revoking sanctioned plans of four separate buildings, however, against the said revocation orders, appeals have been preferred before the Appellate Tribunal - Municipal Corporation of Delhi [‘AT-MCD’] which are still pending and an interim order has also been passed providing therein that no coercive action shall be taken against the properties involved in the said appeals. 4. Since the order revoking the sanctioned building plan is subject matter of an appeal where an interim order has been granted, at this juncture, unless the said appeal is decided finally, no direction as has been sought in this writ petition can be granted and, therefore, continuance of the proceedings of this writ petition will not serve any purpose. 5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. 6. We, however, provide that if any cause of action arises or survives after disposal of the appeals by the AT-MCD, it will be open to the petitioner to take recourse to any remedy which may be available to him under law for seeking redressal of his grievances, including filing of a writ petition before this Court. 7. We may make it clear that we have not made any observation as to the merit of the claims of the respective parties. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J JULY 29, 2026/MJ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/08/2026 at 11:32:41