IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16754 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2025 Thana- Parasi District- Arwal ====================================================== 1. Chardradeep Paswan S/O Late Bhikham Paswan Resident Of Village- Amra choki, P.S- Parasi, Distt.- Arwal. 2. Subhash Paswan S/O Chandradeep Paswan Resident Of Village- Amra choki, P.S- Parasi, Distt.- Arwal. 3. Subalal Paswan @ Subalal Kumar S/O Chandradeep Paswan Resident Of Village- Amra choki, P.S- Parasi, Distt.- Arwal. 4. Kalendra Paswan S/O Late Shrawan Paswan Resident Of Village- Amra choki, P.S- Parasi, Distt.- Arwal. 5. Minta Devi S/O Late Shrawan Paswan Resident Of Village- Amra choki, P.S- Parasi, Distt.- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Prasad Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 3 06-05-2026 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners and Learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Parasi P.S. Case No.69 of 2025 under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS. 3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against 5 named accused persons (the present petitioners) with allegation that petitioner No.1 has assaulted the informant by Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16754 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026 2/3 iron kanti due to which injury has been caused and informant becomes unconscious. The accused persons have also assaulted the informant’s family due to which they also received injury. 4. Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. He submits that the petitioners and informant both are family members and they were working in agricultural land and due to boundary dispute, the scuffling took place between the parties and injury caused to both sides. 5. Counsel further submits that the FIR has been lodged by the petitioner’s side on 03.09.2025 and when informant received knowledge that FIR has been lodged against him, then on 05.09.2025, then the informant’s side lodged the case for the same date and place of occurrence. 6. Counsel submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioners is clean and they are ready to fulfill all the conditions whatsoever shall be imposed upon them. 7. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners and submits that there is specific allegation of assault against petitioner No.1 and in the rejection order, it has come that the injury is grievous in nature. 8. In the present facts and circumstances of this case Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16754 of 2026(3) dt.06-05-2026 3/3 and the submissions made above, let the petitioner Nos.2 to5 namely, Subhash Paswan, Subalal Paswan, Kalendra Paswan and Minta Devi, be granted bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand) each as mentioned in Section 2(1)(d) of the BNSS, 2023 to the satisfaction of ACJM-I, Arwal, in connection with Parasi P.S. Case No.69 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down U/s 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023. 9. So far as the petitioner No.1, namely, Chardradeep Paswan, is concerned, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner No.1, therefore the bail application of the petitioner No.1 is hereby rejected. Prakashmani/- (Dr. Anshuman, J) U T