- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8232 WP NO.23832 OF 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO.23832 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. B.H. PUTTAMMA W/O LATE B.C. PALAKSHI, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/A NO.1/73, BRAHMANARA BEEDI, BAGALURU VILLAGE, HOSURU TALUK, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT, TAMILNADU - 635 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GANGADHARAIAH A.N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED UNDER THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007) DEVANAHALLI, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED UNDER THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007) DODDABALLAPUR SUB-DIVISION, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8232 WP NO.23832 OF 2022 RAMESH DEAD BY HIS LRS 3. SMT. USHA W/O LATE RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS. 4. DIVYA SAI SHREE R. D/O LATE RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS. 5. SAI CHARAN R. S/O LATE RAMESH, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS. RESPONDENTS NO. 3 TO 5 ARE R/AT NO.14, 'MATHRU KRUPA', 1ST MAIN ROAD, 1ST CROSS HOSAKEREHALLI, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 050. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA FOR R1 AND R2; R3 TO R5 - SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN CASE NO.S.C.A APPEAL 2/2022 DATED 21.10.2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-B. CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW THE PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 9 OF THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8232 WP NO.23832 OF 2022 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is no more and accordingly, he seeks for the petition be dismissed as having become infructuous. 2. The submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE ARK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8