Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13851 (CHH)

RAMESH KUMAR GHOSLE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/14143/2025 · 2026-01-05

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:766 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 14143 of 2025 1 - Ramesh Kumar Ghosle S/o Late Falit Ram Aged About 29 Years Working As Assistant Veterinary Field Officer (Avfo), And Posted At Out Line Dispensary Parsiya, Block Pathariya District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Animal Husbandry And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director At Office Of Animal Husbandry Development Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Deputy Director Animal Husbandry Services Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 4 - Collector Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. B.L. Sahu, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Deeksha Gouraha, Dy. Government Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 06 /01/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the impugned relieving order dated 15.12.2025 passed by the Respondent No. 3 arising 2 out of transfer order dated 08.01.2025 passed by the Respondent No. 1, in the interest of justice. 10.2 Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. Learned counsel for the Respondents/State submits that according to her instructions, the representation submitted before the Committee constituted under the Transfer Policy, 2025 was decided by the Committee vide order dated 15.12.2025 and the representation was recommended to be rejected. 3. In the aforementioned facts of the case, the petitioner has to challenge the decision of the Committee constituted under the Transfer Policy, 2025 rejecting his representation and therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable at this stage. Accordingly, it is dismissed reserving liberty with the petitioner to challenge the decision of the Committee constituted under the Transfer Policy also. 4. With the aforesaid observation and directions, this writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY Date: 2026.01.07 11:25:04 +0530