SMT REHNUMA AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/18542/2026 · 2026-10-07
Ajay Bhanot, Divesh Chandra Samant
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13850 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13850 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 18542 of 2026 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J.
HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. The matter is taken up in the revised call. Name of counsel for the first informant is shown in the cause list. No one appears on behalf of the first informant. Learned AGA on the basis of instructions submits that pursuant to a fair and impartial investigation, no incriminating evidence was found against the petitioners and final report has been filed in their favour. Shri Umair Alam, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners do not wish to press the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. October 8, 2026 Karan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umair Alam Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Subodh Pandey (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Smt Rehnuma And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad