IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. MMO No. 28 of 2026 Date of Decision : 1.7.2026 Hem Raj ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & ors. ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : Mr. Sat Prakash, Advocate. For respondents No.1 to 3/State : Mr. Tarun Pathak, Deputy Advocate General. For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Goldy Kumar, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 1st July, 2026 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.