Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13849 (ALL)

MOHSIN KHAN v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/36235/2026 · 2026-10-08

Avnish Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36235 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Heard Sri Sharad Srivastava, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Mohsin Khan to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 371 of 2026, under Sections 204, 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 347(2) of BNS, P.S.- Kotwali, District- Basti, during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in FIR dated 26.08.2026 lodged by the police against applicant with the allegation that accused applicant was using beacon laden vehicle. He claimed himself to be OSD and in official capacity. Further submits that recovery and arrest have been made in the absence of independent witness. There is no such incident took place. On the occasion of Barawafat, there was some gathering and accused applicant was also in the said gathering and having some hot talk with the police which led to the false implication of the accused. Further submits that charge sheet is submitted. The accused applicant has no criminal history. The accused applicant is languishing in jail since 26.08.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail. 4. Learned A.G.A. for State opposed the bail application. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashutosh Shukla, Avanish Kumar Shukla, Sharad Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohsin Khan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Considering the arrest and recovery have been made in the absence of independent witness, the accused/applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. October 9, 2026 Sharad/- BAIL No. 36235 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad