Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13847 (AP)

RAMAYYA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/19774/2026 · 2026-10-13

Battu Devanand, Tuhin Kumar Gedela

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 : APHC010364542026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 14th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION NO: 19774 OF 2026 Between: 1. RAMAYYA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, Rep. by its Managing Director Sri. Mogga Sitaramayya, S/o (Late) Venkataramana, Aged about 60 years, situated at D.No. 9-102, Pendurthi Main Road, Sanathivanipalem, Vepagunta, Visakhapatnam - 47, Andhra Pradesh, PAN No. AAECM1742N, EMail msrcDloffice@amail.com.. Mobile No.6281989888 ...Petitioner AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, Rep. by its Secretary, Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance, New Delhi-110001. 2. Visakhapatnam Cooperative Bank Limited, Main Branch, 5th Lane, Dwaraka Nagar, Visakhapatnam- 530016, Rep.by its Chief Executive Officer. 3. Visakhapatnam Cooperative Bank Limited, Pendurthi Branch, Pendurthi, Visakhapatnam District -530 051 Rep.by its Branch Manager. 4. Visakhapatnam Cooperative Bank Limited, Gopalapatnam Branch, Gopalapatnam, Visakhapatnam District - 530 027, Rep.by its Branch Manager. 2 ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not providing the correct details of all the Six (06) Loan Accounts due from the petitioner for repayment in phased manner of each individual Loan Account, as illegal, arbitrary, and consequently direct the respondents to provide correct details of all the Six (06) Accounts for repayment in phased manner for each individual account and further direct the respondents not to proceed further in pursuance of Pre-Sale Notice for Sale of Immovable Properties, issued in the form of Paper Publications, dt.03.07.2026 under Rule-8 (6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 under SARFAESI Act, 2002, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay of all and further proceedings in pursuance of Pre-Sale Notice for Sale of Immovable Properties, issued in the form of Paper Publications, dt.03.07.2026 under Rule-8 (6) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 under SARFAESI Act, 2002, pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: KUMBHAJADALA KAUSHIK, CENTRAL GOVT.COUNSEL Counsel for the Respondents:POSANI AKASH The Court made the following order: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.19774 OF 2026 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Battu Devanand) This Writ Petition is filed against the action of the 4th respondent in not providing correct details of loan accounts due from the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that now the details of the loan accounts were furnished to the petitioner. 3. In view of the above factual position, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 4. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND ____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Dated: 14.10.2026 TM 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND & THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.19774 OF 2026 Dated: 14.10.2026 TM