CWP-10347 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT M/s Chawla Digital Systems Private State of Punjab and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Arvind Rajotia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Maninderjit Singh Bedi, Mr. Saurav Mr. Sangam Garg, Advocate, for the respondents DEEPAK SIBAL Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage petitioner would be satisfied if the direction to the technically unresponsive. Advocate General, Punjab who appears before us for the respondents states that to be unresponsive today and that for at least in question shall not be opened. The afore statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Disposed of. Needless to add that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the reasons to be supplied to him accordance with law. April 07, 2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : 10347 of 2026 (O&M) Sr. No.156 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10347 of 2026 Date of Decision : M/s Chawla Digital Systems Private Limited …Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondent HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Arvind Rajotia, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Maninderjit Singh Bedi, Advocate Mr. Saurav Verma, Additional A.G., Punjab Mr. Sangam Garg, Advocate, for the respondents-PSPCL. *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage would be satisfied if the present writ the respondents to supply reasons for holding the petitioner technically unresponsive. Advocate General, Punjab who appears before us for the respondents states that detailed reasons for holding the petitioner to be unresponsive shall be served upon the petitioner within three days from today and that for at least three days thereafter, the shall not be opened. The afore statement made by the Advocate General, Punjab satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. Disposed of. Needless to add that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the reasons to be supplied to him as above, he would be at liberty to challenge accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 10347 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 07.04.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Advocate General, Punjab with Verma, Additional A.G., Punjab Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage, the present writ petition is disposed of with a respondents to supply reasons for holding the petitioner to be Advocate General, Punjab who appears before us for the detailed reasons for holding the petitioner’s technical bid shall be served upon the petitioner within three days from the financial bids qua the tender Advocate General, Punjab satisfies Needless to add that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the reasons to , he would be at liberty to challenge the same, in DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.04.10 09:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document