Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1384 (JHR)

PAPPU RAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1475/2026 · 2026-03-16

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6936 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1475 of 2026 --------- Pappu Ray, aged about 25 years, son of Rahul Ray, resident of Khijurma, P.O. & P.S.- Taljhari, District-Dumka. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Ms. Kehkashan Afsheen, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-16.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 61 of B.N.S., 2023 and under Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D), 84(C) of I.T. Act in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 111/2024. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. She further submits that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 18.10.2024; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. She submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and that the petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2024; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum- Cyber Crime, Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No. 111/2024. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) March 16, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 17.03.2026