Satyadeo Yadav @ Satyadeo Hajra v. The State of Bihar
CWJC/6133/2026 · 2026-05-14
Rajiv Roy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13837 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13837 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6133 of 2026 ====================================================== Satyadeo Yadav @ Satyadeo Hajra Son of Late Bathu Hajra, resident of Village- Belhi Bela, P.O and P.S- Jay Nagar, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Government of Bihar, Department of Mines and Geology, Patna
2. The Additional Secretary, Government of Bihar, Department of Mines and Geology, Patna.
3. The Collector/District Magistrate cum District Mining Officer, Madhubani.
4. The Assistant Mining Officer, Madhubani
5. The Director, Mines and Geology Department, Bihar, Patna ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC-3 For the Mines : Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Spl. P.P. Mines Mr. Brij Bihari Tiwary, Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 14-05-2026 Heard the case.
2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s): I) for that the concerned respondents may be
directed to give permission to cultivate the own raiyati land of petitioner. II) For that the concerned respondents may be directed to take consent from the petitioner prior to participate in the bid of Settlement of Balu Ghat since the petitioner is raiyat of land Vide Area 5.30 Acre, S.P No. 2283P and 2296P.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6133 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026 2/3 III) For that the concerning respondents may be directed to give compensation of Balu Ghat land prior to bid of Settlementt Balu Ghat raiyati land of petitioner. IV) For that the concerning respondents may be directed to give permission to the petitioner to remove simple sandy soil from his raiyati agriculturable land. V) For that the concerned respondents may be directed to create separate Unit for the raiyati Ghat to the Kamla river. VI) For that any other relief/reliefs may also be provided to the petitioner if he deserves the same.
3. It has been pointed out by the State that the Collector, Madhubani has already passed an order vide memo no. 743 dated 15.10.2024 (annexure P/5 to the petition) pursuant to the order passed by the Writ Court on 29.08.2024 in CWJC No. 15021/2023 (Satyadev Yadav vs. State and others). However, there is nothing on record to show that whether the direction of the Collector, Madhubani was followed by the petitioner or not.
4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be taking appropriate steps to submit application/representation before appropriate authority in the light of the direction given by the Collector, Madhubani.
Patna High Court CWJC No.6133 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026 3/3
5. Granting said liberty, the writ petition is disposed of.
Vijay Singh/Sanny Patel (Rajiv Roy, J) U