12-REVN-231-IA-1566-REVN-231-2026.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 231 OF 2026 Jaimala Vishnu Parulekar …Applicant Versus Mayur Vishnu Parulekar & Ors. …Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1566 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 231 OF 2026 Jaimala Vishnu Parulekar …Applicant Versus Mayur Vishnu Parulekar & Ors. …Respondents Ms. Jaimala V. Parulekar, Applicant, in person. Mr. S. A. Waradkar, for the Respondent Ms. M. R. Tidke, APP, for the Respondent-State. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 30 September 2026 P.C.: 1. Heard Ms. Jaimala Parulekar, Applicant, in person and Mr. Waradkar, learned Counsel for Respondent No.1 and 2. 2. The Interim Application No. 1566 of 2026 is taken out for condonation of delay of 230 days in filing Criminal Revision Application. Aftab S. 30th September, 2026 12-REVN-231-IA-1566-REVN-231-2026.DOC 3. Ms. Parulekar, the Applicant points out the reasons and states that adequate reasons are given. Mr. Waradkar, learned Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 strongly opposes the Application. 4. There is delay of 230 days in filing the Criminal Revision Application. The reasons are set out in Paragraph No. 4. It is stated that the Applicant is a senior citizen, the Applicant prepared a draft of Review Petition in time to be filed in the Sessions Court, however, the Officials of the Sessions Court advised the Applicant to file an Appeal and, therefore, after taking advice this Criminal Revision application has been filed. The Applicant states that, in this process there is delay in filing the Criminal Revision Application. The Applicant is a senior citizen of 71 years. Accordingly, adequate reasons are given. 5. For the reasons sought out in the Interim Application, the same is allowed by condoning the delay of 230 days in filing the Criminal Revision Application. 6. The Interim Application is disposed of. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Aftab S. 30th September, 2026