COCP-887 IN THE HI 218 Akhil Dr. Prem Sin CORAM: Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Court in CW others’ wher 2. Writ Court o with till date 3. the Writ C complied w 887-2026 -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o Versus em Singh HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate fo Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 08.10.2025 (Annex CWP-20342-2025, titled as ‘Ak whereby it was directed as follows:- “xxx xxx Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, served with an advance copy appearance on behalf of resp Court that representation date will be decided by passing a sp of 8 weeks from today and a co be supplied to the petitioner wit It is submitted by learned coun ourt order dated 08.10.2025 (Annexu date. Per Contra, learned counsel fo rit Court order dated 08.10.2025 ( ied with and the representation dat ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-887-2026 Date of Decision: 19.03.2026 .…Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA cate for the petitioner. l. A.G., Haryana. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by the Writ Akhil vs. State of Haryana and - xxx aj, Addl. AG, Haryana, having copy of the petition, has put in respondent/State and assures the dated 03.01.2025 (Annexure P-1) a speaking order, within a period a copy of said speaking order will r within one week thereafter..” d counsel for the petitioner that the nnexure P-1) has not been complied sel for the respondent submits that 2025 (Annexure P-1) stands duly on dated 03.01.2025 filed by the ging Writ and ng in he 1) od ill t the lied that duly the RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-887 petitioner ha 17.03.2026 4. Court is tak learned coun 5. 6. required to b of, according 7. Speaking O 8. 9. 19.03.2026 rishu 887-2026 -2- has been considered and decided 2026. As such, nothing survives in the Copy of Speaking Order dated is taken on record. A copy thereof d counsel for the petitioner. Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. The petitioner would be at libe Order, in accordance with law, if s Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable ecided vide Speaking Order dated in the present petition. r dated 17.03.2026 handed over in thereof, has also been supplied to above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed at liberty to challenge the aforesaid if so advised. any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No ated r in d to are sed said RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 15:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.