1 2026:CGHC:6388-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 302 of 2026 Smt. Aasha Chandrakar W/o Rajnish Chandrakar Aged About 49 Years R/o Qr. No.4 A, Road No.23, Sector-10, P.S. Bhilai Nagar Sector-6, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Padmanabhpur, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 2 - Saurya Renke S/o Shri Ashok Renke Aged About 30 Years R/o Near Old Shiv Mandir, Vaishali Nagar Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Vikas Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Mr. SS Baghel, Government Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 05.02.2026 2 1. Heard Mr. Vikas Shrivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. SS Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for respondent No.1/State. 2. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023 with following prayer: “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present petition and thereby extend the time granted to deposit the cost of Rs.2,000/- before this Hon'ble Court, vide order dated 07.01.2026.” 3. Vide order dated 07.01.2026 in CRMP No.16/2026, this Court has passed the following order/direction: “5. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file petition afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today, and the same shall be transmitted to the Government Specialized Adoption Agency Bemetara (C.G.), for wasting the precious time of this Court.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 07.01.2026, the petitioner was directed to deposit a sum of Rs.2,000/- before the Registry of this Court within a period of one week, however, owing to certain unavoidable circumstances, the petitioner could not 3 deposit the said amount within the stipulated period. The delay in compliance of order of this Court is neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court seeking extension of time for compliance of the order dated 07.01.2026 passed in CRMP No. 16/2026. 5. Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection to the limited prayer made on behalf of the petitioner. 6. In view of above submissions, the instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is granted one week’s further time to comply with the order dated dated 07.01.2026 passed by this Court in CRMP No.16/2026. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice J.