Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13831 (JHR)

BHULAN GOPE ALIAS PUGLA GOPE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./1285/2026 · 2026-03-13

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:6744] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1285 of 2026 1. Bhulan Gope @ Pugla Gope, aged about 30 years, S/o Kisto Gope; 2. Lalu Gope, aged about 29 years, S/o Dhanu Gope; 3. Dinesh Gope, aged about 29 years, S/o Shankar Gope; 4. Laxman Kumar Gope, aged about 29 years, S/o Shishthi Gope. 5. Tulsi Gope, aged about 44 years, S/o Late Gopi Gope, All are residents of Village- Pupunki, P.O.- Pupunki Ashram, P.S.- Chas (M), District- Bokaro (Jharkhand) ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 13.03.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No. 150 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 221, 132, 324(4), 121(1), 121(2), 109(1), 125(a), 125(b), 351(2), 352 and 111(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners were neither present at the place of alleged occurrence nor they assaulted or obstructed any police officer in discharge of their official duty and only on the basis of suspicion, the petitioners have [ 2026:JHHC:6744] -2- been implicated in this case. He next submits that although the petitioners are named in the FIR, however, allegations are also made against 40-50 unknown persons in the FIR. 4. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of assault by way of pelting stones etc. 5. Looking into the contents of the FIR, it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegations against 40-50 unknown persons and further the nature of injury has not been mentioned in the order of the learned Sessions Judge and in that view of the matter, the petitioners, named above, are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks from today and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-13.03.2026 Amitesh/-