IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5917 of 2026 ====================================================== 1. Suresh Sharma Son of Late Ramdev Vishwakarma @ Late Ramdev Sharma Resident of Mohalla-Kotha Toli, Sasaram, P.S-Sasaram (T), District- Rohtas, Pin Code No.821115. 2. Sanjay Kumar Sharma @ Sanjay Sharma, Son of Late Nathuni Vishwakarma, Resident of Mohalla-Kotha Toli, Sasaram, P.S-Sasaram (T), District- Rohtas, Pin Code No.821115. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural and Urban-Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Chairman, Municipal Corporation Sasaram, Rohtas. 3. The Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation. Sasaram, Rohtas. 4. The Executive Officer, Municipal Corporation, Sasaram, Rohtas. 5. Shyamlal Sharma, son of Late Mohan Vishwakarma , Resident of Mohalla- Kotha Toli, P.S-Sasaram (T), District- Rohtas. 6. Prayaral Sharma, son of Late Mohan Vishwakarma, Resident of Mohalla- Kotha Toli, P.S-Sasaram (T), District- Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Standing Counsel 6 For the Resp. No. 2 to 4 : Mr. Bajarangi Lal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 2 04-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioners have filed the instant application for the following relief (s) :- “1. That, this is an application for issuance of the appropriate writ/writs, order/orders or direction/directions to the respondent authorities to allot the Share and issued the Licence of a Shop situated under Gola Bazar, Sasaram, Plot. No.223, Ward No.03.(Old), Ward No.26(New), 47 Kari in Patna High Court CWJC No.5917 of 2026(2) dt.04-05-2026 2/2 the favour of the petitioners as per their Share alloted in the entire Lease Area (47 Kari) and also for restaining the respondents No.5 and 6 to not disturb the possession of the petitioner.” 3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, the writ application is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioners to file a representation before the Municipal Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Sasaram, Rohtas (respondent no.3) within a period of four weeks from today. Any representation so filed shall be disposed of by the respondent no.3 in accordance with law within a period of three months from the date of its filing. 4. It is made clear that the Court has not entered into the merits of the case of the petitioners which is to be decided by the respondent concerned. 5. The writ application stands disposed of. Shiv/- (Partha Sarthy, J) U