Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13825 (CHH)

FANESHWAR YADAV v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/894/2021 · 2026-01-01

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:175 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 894 of 2021 1. Faneshwar Yadav S/o Shri Balram Yadav Aged About 55 Years Resident Of Q.No. A 104, Siddha Shikhar Extension Apartment , Shanti Nagar , Bilaspur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Energy, Nawa Raipur , Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Managing Director Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited , Danganiya, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3. The Chairman Chhattisgarh State Regulatory Commission, Irrigation Colony, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4. Shri P.K. Kashyap Superintendent Engineer (Operation And Maintenance) Bilaspur Circle, Tifra , Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : None For State : Mr. Keshav Prasad Dewangan, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Ghanshyam Patel, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 02.01.2026 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to the respondents to MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2026.01.02 16:48:58 +0530 2 decide the representation/complaint within reasonable time. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 would submit that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed as the enquiry has been conducted and in the report it has been found it null and void, therefore, this petition has become infructuous. 3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the respondent No. 2, this petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to challenge the final outcome of the enquiry report before appropriate forum. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish