MOHD. IBRAHIM v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND 5 OTHERS
A227/5777/2015 · 2026-10-08
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13820 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5777 of 2015 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This is a plaintiff's petition. In the suit filed by the plaintiff, an application for grant of temporary injunction (6-C) was moved which was refused by both the Courts below.
2. Having gone through material on record, I find that no interference is required by this Court in the order impugned.
3. Writ petition fails and is hereby dismissed. October 9, 2026 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : S. Shanawaz Shah, Smt. Farida Jamal Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ghanshyam Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Tiwari (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Mohd. Ibrahim .....Petitioner(s) Additional District Judge And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad