Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1382 (RAJ)

SMT. KHUSHBOO W/O SH. SURENDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1968/2026 · 2026-04-02

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13936] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 1968/2026 Smt. Khushboo W/o Sh. Surendra, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhapar, P.S. Surajgarh, Dist. Jhunjhunju (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nikhil Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Vaishnavi for Mr. Ahvin Garg HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 02/04/2026 1. The instant second bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS, 2023 on behalf of the accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 0249/2024 registered at Police Station Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Section 124(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is a young female, aged about 29 years. It is further submitted that incorrectly in the first bail order dated 01.11.2025 instead of two criminal antecedents registered against the applicant, three criminal antecedents were recorded. It is next submitted that the applicant has been behind bars since last one year, and therefore, the concession of bail should be granted to the applicant. [2026:RJ-JP:13936] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1968/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application and has submitted that considering all the facts and circumstances, including the criminal antecedents of the applicant, the previous bail application was dismissed by this Court vide order 01.11.2025. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and upon assiduous perusal of the previous order dated 01.11.2025 passed by this Court, and taking note of the fact that there is no substantial material change in circumstances to warrant interference in this successive application, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting on the merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the second bail application filed by the accused- applicant. 5. Accordingly, the instant second bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS stands dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-160