Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13819 (CHH)

SHRI RAWATPURA SARKAR INSTITUTE OF NURSING v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/449/2026 · 2026-02-02

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:5950 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 449 of 2026 * - Shri Rawatpura Sarkar Institute Of Nursing (Under The Aegis Of Shri Rawatpura Sarkar Lok Kalyan Trust), Village Dhaneli, Post - Mana, Near Sadani Darbar, Raipur Chhattisgarh 492015 ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of Medical Education Chhattisgarh, Swasthya Bhawan, 2nd Floor North Block, Sector 19, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh 2 – Director, Directorate Of Medical Education Chhattisgarh, Old Nursing Hostel, DKS Bhawan Parisar, Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Senior Advocate with Mr. Udit Khatri and Mr. Ashutosh Shrivastava, Advocates For Respondents/State : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Deputy Advocate General Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 03/02/2026 1. Instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner – Shri Rawatpura Sarkar Institute of Nursing seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 It is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the Petitioner Company from the possession of respondents for its kind perusal. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.02.05 17:49:23 +0530 2 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ commanding the Respondent Authority to issue renewal order for the clinical training permission for the academic session 2025-26. 10.3 Any other relief/reliefs, which this Hon’ble Court may think fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, with cost of the petition, may also please be granted to the petitioner.” 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that initially vide order dated 29.07.2016 passed by respondent No. 2 – Director, Directorate of Medical Education, the petitioner -Institution was granted clinical training permission to use Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Smriti Chikitsalaya, Raipur Community Health Centre, Arang and Primary Health Center, Mandir Hasaud, Raipur for practical and experimental training of students. Such permission was also granted to the petitioner - institution for the years 2022, 2023, 2024 and till August 2025, thereafter, the petitioner again moved an application before respondent No. 2 for grant of clinical training permission to use aforesaid institutions for practical and experimental training for its students for the academic year 2025-2026, which has not been decided yet, thereafter, the petitioner filed representations dated 24.03.2025 vide Annexure P-17 and 03.09.2025 & 13.01.2026 vide Annexure P-19 in this regard, but the same have also not been decided yet, therefore, learned Senior Counsel submits that this petition may be disposed of directing respondent No. 2 / competent authority to decide application / representations (Annexures P-17 & P-19) filed by the petitioner for the said purpose within a specific time frame. 3. Counsel for the State/respondents submits that if the application / representation filed by the petitioner for renewal permission of clinical 3 training for the academic sessions 2025-2026 is pending, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Perusal of record shows that application / representations (Annexures P-17 & P-19) for the said purpose was filed by the petitioner in the month of March / September, 2025, but the same have not been decided yet, reminder was also sent by the Principal of petitioner- Institution in this regard, whereas, academic session 2025-2026 is said to be completed in the month of March, 2026. 6. Having considered the arguments advanced on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and also having considered the aforesaid facts, respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the application / representations (Annexures P-17 & P-19) filed by the petitioner- Institution for grant of clinical training permission to use Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar Smriti Chikitsalaya, Raipur Community Health Centre, Arang and Primary Health Center, Mandir Hasaud, Raipur for practical and experimental training of students expeditiously preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt / submissions of copy of this order. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti