Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13818 (RAJ)

SUMITRA KUMARI W/O HANUMAN SAHAI GARHWAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/15905/2026 · 2026-08-14

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:32379] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15905/2026 CNR: RJHC020782752026 | URN: CW / 33874U / 2026 Sumitra Kumari W/o Hanuman Sahai Garhwal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Vpo Jajekalan, Block Shahpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Eduction, Rajasthan Bikaner. 3. The District Eduction Officer (Hqrs), Secondary Education, Chittorgarh. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan & Ms. Savita Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 14/08/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation within a period of 7 days in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012). 2. Heard. 3. This Court directs Respondent No.3 to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same [2026:RJ-JP:32379] (2 of 2) [CW-15905/2026] within a period of 15 days, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in Pawan Meena (Supra) and Circular dated 19.02.2024. 4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/s-253