1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Petition No. 964 of 2026 Decided on: 30.06.2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deewani and others …..Petitioners Versus State of H.P and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Shivom Vashista, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioners has invited attention to para-3 of compliance affidavit filed by the respondent. As per this affidavit, decisions on the basis of which representation of petitioners were directed to be considered, have been stayed in Letters Patent Appeal filed by the respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in view of reply/compliance affidavit filed by the respondents, he is under instructions not to press the execution petition at this stage, however, petitioners be reserved liberty to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for redressal of their grievances at an appropriate stage in case necessity so arises in future. 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 2. In view of above, granting such permission, petition to stand disposed of. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua June 30, 2026 Judge yogesh