( 2026:JHHC:6873 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 636 of 2026 ------ 1. Pradip Kumar Tripathi @ Pradeep Kumar Tripathi @ Pradeep Tripathi @ Bablu Tripathi, aged about 49 years, son of Nidhi Nath Tripathi, resident of N 8/155 A-9, K.N. Kailashpuri Colony, Sundarpur Newada, Hindu Vishwa Vidyalay, Varanasi, P.O. and P.S. –Varanasi, District – Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh). 2. Santosh Kumar Singh, aged about 58 years, son of Shiv Bahadur Singh, Resident of Bagaha, P.O. & P.S. –Bagaha, District –Mirzapur (Uttar Pradesh). .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opp. Parties ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner s : Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocate : Mr. Kumar Rahul, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajneesh Vardhan, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 13.03.2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioners for restoration of Cr.M.P. No. 1069 of 2024 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Cr.M.P. No. 1069 of 2024 was dismissed for non-prosecution. It is next submitted that due to inadvertence and ill health condition of wife of Mr. Ganesh Pathak, Advocate, the counsel for the petitioner, could not appear before the Court when the case was called out resulting in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No. 1069 of 2024. It is next submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No. 1069 of 2024 and unless Cr.M.P. No. 1069 of 2024 is restored to its original file, the petitioners will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No. 1069 of 2024 be restored to its original file. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, Cr.M.P. No. 1069 of 2024 is restored to its original file to the stage at which, it was before its dismissal. List Cr.M.P. No. 1069 of 2024 under the appropriate heading after a week. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 13.03.2026 Sonu-