Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13814 (BOM)

SAMARTH COLLECTION v. SUSHIL CREATIONS SHRI. SUSHIL PREMCHAND VANJANI

REVN/414/2023 · 2026-10-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 414 OF 2023 Samarth Collection … Applicant V/s. Sushil Creations Shri. Sushil Premchand Vanjani … Respondent ________________________ Adv. Anand Patil, for the applicant. Adv. Changdev Shingade i/b Adv. Sagar Tambe, for the respondent. _________________________ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : OCTOBER 1, 2026 P.C.: 1. Both the counsels have tendered consent terms dated 1 October 2026. They submit that their respective parties have signed in their presence and they identify their signatures. Learned counsel for the parties state that they have explained to the signatories the contents of consent terms and the signatories have signed the consent terms after understanding the contents. Learned counsel for applicant state that all the signatories are also present in Court and they identify their respective clients. The consent terms are taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. 2. For ease of reference, scanned copy of the Consent Terms is reproduced herein below:- 1/7 Rushi 34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc 2/7 Rushi 34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc 3/7 Rushi 34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc 4/7 Rushi 34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc 5/7 Rushi 34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc 6/7 Rushi 34-REVN-414-2023-(CR).doc 3. All statements made in consent terms are accepted as undertaking given to this Court. All Statements are also accepted. 4. The Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of in terms of Consent Terms dated 1 October 2026. 5. All parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) 7/7 Rushi