- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7631 WP No. 1025 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 1025 OF 2026 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN: MR. SUSHAN S/O M R SHARAN AGE ABOUT 22 EARS R/AT NO 12-6/10, ARTS HOME NEAR MUTHAPPA GUDI SKATHINAGAR MANGALORE - 575016 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KARUNAKARA P., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY THE VICE CHANCELOR NAVANAGAR HUBLI DISTRICT - 580025 2. SHRI DHARMASTHALA MANJUNATHESHWARA LAW COLLEGE AND CENTRE FOR POSTGRADUATE STUDIES AND RESEARCH IN LAW REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL M G ROAD, KODIALBAIL MANGALORE DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575003 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. AKASH B SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R2) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7631 WP No. 1025 of 2026 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO WRITE THE 7TH SEMESTER EXAMINATION. DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO PERMIT THE PETITIONER TO BE PROMOTED TO THE 5TH YEAR LLB. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs : (i) To direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to write the 7th semester examination. (ii) direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to be promoted to the 5th year LLB.” 2. This Court, vide order dated 19.01.2026, permitted the petitioner to write VII Semester Examination. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.2, on instructions, submits that despite the interim order granted by this Court, the petitioner did not appear - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7631 WP No. 1025 of 2026 for the VII Semester Examination. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner is having only 58% of attendance and hence, the petitioner is not qualified for the examination or the next semester. 4. Submission is placed on record. 5. In view of the reliefs sought by the petitioner and the compliance of the interim order granted by this Court by respondent No.2, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of having rendered infructuous. 6. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK CT:KHV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 21