NIC Ltd. Vs. Ram Kali & Ors. CMPs No. 13077 & 13078/2026 in FAO No. 416/2008 01.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Advocate, for the non- applicant/appellant. Mr. Dinesh Bhanot, Advocate, for applicants/respondents. CMP No. 13077/2026 The present application under Order 32, Rule 12, read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been filed by applicants/respondents No. 2 to 4 for discharging their natural guardian, as they have attained the age of majority. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant and also taking into consideration the fact that the applicants have now attained the age of majority, as is evident from their Matriculation Certificates, appended with the application as Annexure A-1 (colly), wherein date of birth of applicant/respondent No. 2 Sunil Kumar alias Sita Ram has been mentioned as 01.09.1995, date of birth of applicant/respondent No. 3 Bandna has been mentioned as 25.04.1999 and date of birth of applicant/respondent No. 3 Seema Devi has been mentioned as 14.09.2002, the present application is allowed and natural guardianship of applicants/respondents No. 2 to 4 is ordered to be ….2…. discharged and they are permitted to pursue the case in their own capacity. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 13078/2026 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of applicant/respondent No. 2, Sita Ram, for release of the award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. As per the applicant, his name was inadvertently mentioned as Sunil Kumar in the array of parties, however the same has now been corrected as Sita Ram vide order dated 02.07.2025, passed by learned Tribunal below. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellant has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit ...3... of the applicant, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same is allowed and the award amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of applicant/respondent No. 2, Sita Ram, as per his share, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to his bank account, details whereof have been mentioned in para-3 of the application. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 1st July, 2026 (raman)