Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 138 (UTT)

JAGMOHAN SINGH KAFOLA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C528/2229/2025 · 2026-01-03

Alok Kumar Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:88 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 3rd JANUARY, 2026 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 2229 OF 2025 Jagmohan Singh Kafola ..... Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Assistant Government Advocate. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. An Application was filed in Special Sessions Trial No.28 of 2022 to provide copies to the applicant- accused. The said Application has been rejected by the learned Special Judge (Anti Corruption) / IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital on 02.12.2025. 2. The present Application has been filed by the applicant-accused to direct the Special Judge (Anti Corruption) / IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital to provide copies of the documents, as mentioned in the paragraph nos. 2, 3, 4 and paragraph no.5 of annexure no.-5. These documents have been submitted by the Investigating Officer along with charge-sheet. 3 Heard Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, learned counsel 1 2026:UHC:88 for the applicant and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent. 4. The said request of the applicant has not been opposed by the respondent. 5. The present Criminal Miscellaneous Application (No.2229 of 2025), filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, is disposed of directing the learned Special Judge (Anti Corruption) / IInd Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital to provide the copies of the said documents as per rules. ___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Date: 03.01.2026 Shiv 2