CRM-M-1559 IN THE H (214) JANISH STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Mr. N MANISHA BATR 1. The 483 of Bharatiya N of regular bail in under Sections 11 short “BNS”) (cor Station Naraingarh 2. The statement got reco evening of 26.09.2 Harsh and Manish 15597-2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH Versus
HARYANA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Vishal Jassal, Advocate for the pe Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The instant petition has been filed atiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in case arising out of FIR No.30 ons 110, 115, 118(2), 3(5), 351(2) of ”) (corresponding Sections 308, 323, 3 ingarh, District Ambala. The aforementioned FIR was reg recorded by the complainant Visha 26.09.2025, he was present at Krishna anish, when the petitioner accompan JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-15597-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 27.03.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA
r the petitioner by the petitioner under Section , 2023 (for short “BNSS”) for grant 309 dated 27.09.2025 registered (2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for 323, 326, 34, 506 of IPC) at Police s registered on the basis of the t Vishal alleging therein that on the rishna Market alongwith his friends ompanied by the co-accused formed M) 2026 oner
dent
ction grant tered (for olice the the iends rmed AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.27 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-1559 an unlawful assem blow with the gea caused injuries on rushed for his res and then they fled 3. After The petitioner was Investigation now 4. It is a falsely implicated take considerable any useful purpos petition deserves t 5. Notic 6. On th accepts notice of counsel has argue nature. He along grievous injuries o material witnesses intimidating thos that the petition do 15597-2026 (O&M) 2 assembly and opened an assault upo he gear-welded rod on his right leg, ries on his person with their respectiv rescue, they too sustained injuries y fled away. After registration of FIR, investigatio er was arrested on 15.10.2025. The c n now stands completed. It is argued by learned counsel for icated in this case. He is in custody si erable time to conclude. His further purpose. He has clean antecedents. es to be allowed. Notice of motion. On the asking of the Court, Mr. N ice of the petition and is ready to ar argued that the allegations against alongwith the co-accused had volun uries on the person of the complainan tnesses are yet to be examined. The those witnesses, if extended benefit o tion does not deserve to be allowed. ult upon him. The petitioner struck whereas the other accused also pective weapons. When his friends juries at the hands of the assailants tion proceedings were initiated. The co-accused were also arrested. r the petitioner that he has been tody since 15.10.2025. The trial will urther incarceration would not serve It is, therefore, argued that the Mr. Neeraj Poswal, AAG, Haryana to argue the case. Learned State gainst the petitioner are serious in voluntary caused simple as well as lainant and one of his friends. The . There are chances of petitioner’s nefit of bail. It is, therefore, argued truck also iends lants ated. sted. been l will serve t the yana State s in ll as The ner’s gued AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.27 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-1559 7. This C for both the parties 8. The p with the co-accuse of the complainan petitioner. The all subject offences 15.10.2025. He i commence and ob fruitful purpose w well settled propo Pre-trial incarcera object of the jail is be preventive or p of the opinion tha stage. Accordingly released on bail su satisfaction of the concerned. 9. In the petitioner, it shall application seekin 15597-2026 (O&M) 3 This Court has heard the rival submis parties at considerable length. The petitioner by forming members accused is alleged to have voluntarily lainant and his two friends. Specific in he allegations prima facie make out nces as against the petitioner. How e is not required for further inve nd obviously it will take considerable ose would be served by continued de proposition of law is that bail is the arceration should not be replica of po jail is to secure appearance of the acc e or punitive. In view of the discussio on that a case is made out for grant o rdingly, the petition is allowed and t bail subject to his furnishing personal of the learned trial Court/Chief Judici In the event of there being any FIR t shall be open to the respondent-State seeking cancellation of bail. ubmissions made by learned counsel mbership of an unlawful assembly ntarily caused injuries on the person cific injury has been attributed to the e out a case for commission of the However, he is in custody since r investigation. The trial is yet to erable time to conclude. As such no ued detention of the petitioner. The is the rule and jail is an exception. of post-conviction sentencing. The he accused during trial, and it cannot scussion as made above, this Court is grant of bail to the petitioner at this and the petitioner is ordered to be rsonal as well as surety bonds to the Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate y FIR/complaint lodged against the State to seek redressal by filing an unsel mbly rson o the f the since et to h no The tion. The nnot urt is this to be o the trate t the g an AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.27 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-1559 10. It is m the purpose of dec on the merits of th 11. Since any, is rendered in 27.03.2026 Amit Sharma 15597-2026 (O&M) 4 It is made clear that any observation of deciding the present petition and t s of the case. Since the main petition has been all ered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes
  
vation made herein above is only for and the same shall have no bearing een allowed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA)
Yes/No
for aring n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.03.27 18:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.