Sh. Thompson C. Lalrambuatsaiha v. The State of Mizoram
Bail Appln./10/2026 · 2026-03-18
Sanjeev Kumar Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 138 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 138 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC030001502026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./10/2026 Sh. Thompson C. Lalrambuatsaiha S/o C.Lalngaihawma, Venghnuai, Aizawl
VERSUS The State of Mizoram Aizawl Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr J C Lalnunsanga Advocate for the Respondent : P.P./Addl.PP, Mizoram
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 19.03.2026 Heard Mr. J.C. Lalnunsanga, learned counsel for the petitioner through V.C. Also heard Mrs. Linda L. Fambawl, learned Public Prosecutor for the State. Mrs. Linda L. Fambawl, learned Public Prosecutor submits that Case Diary could not be obtained and however, the Charge-sheet has not yet been filed. The learned Public Prosecutor has no information as to whether any Section of
Page No.# 2/2 the Arms Act has been added. Hence, as of now, the statutory period of detention must be regarded as 60 days, in view of the fact that the case has been registered under Section 188(1) BNS, which period has already expired yesterday. Hence, the petitioner is entitled to default bail. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner, namely, Sh. Thompson C. Lalrambuatsaiha shall be released on bail of Rs. 50,000/- with 2 sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned jurisdictional Magistrate. It is further provided that the petitioner shall not try to influence or intimated witnesses in any manner or tamper with the evidence. Bail Application stands allowed as above.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant