204 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AMIT KUMAR STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. A.K. Sehrawat, Advocate for the Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG, None for respondent No.2. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) The present appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 16.01.2026 passed by learned ASJ Karnal vide which anticipatory bail application of the appellant has been dismissed. This Court v interim bail to the Learned counsel for the dated 02.04.2026, the Learned State counsel submits that he does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the In view of the above, the order dated Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. 23.04.2026 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AMIT KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. A.K. Sehrawat, Advocate for the Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG, Haryana. None for respondent No.2. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) The present appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 16.01.2026 passed by learned ASJ Karnal vide which anticipatory bail application of the appellant has been dismissed. his Court vide order dated 02.04.2026 interim bail to the appellant, subject to his joining the investigation. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that in pursuance to the order , the appellant has joined the investigation. Learned State counsel submits that he does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the In view of the above, the order dated 02.04.2026 Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRA-S-643-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 23.04.2026 .....APPELLANT .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. A.K. Sehrawat, Advocate for the appellant. The present appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 16.01.2026 passed by learned ASJ Karnal vide which anticipatory bail application of 02.04.2026, granted the concession of , subject to his joining the investigation. submits that in pursuance to the order d the investigation. Learned State counsel submits that he does not controvert the said fact and further submits that custodial interrogation of the appellant is not required. 02.04.2026 is made absolute. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE The present appeal has been filed against the impugned order dated 16.01.2026 passed by learned ASJ Karnal vide which anticipatory bail application of granted the concession of submits that in pursuance to the order Learned State counsel submits that he does not controvert the said fact HIMANSHU 2026.04.23 18:20 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document