Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 13795 (BOM)

SACHIN VILAS SHINDE v. KIRAN PRAKASH PATIL AND ANR.

REVN/52/2023 · 2026-10-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. REVISION APPLN. NO. 52 OF 2023 Sachin Vilas Shinde … Applicant V/s. Kiran Prakash Patil And Anr. … Respondents ________________________ Adv. Samay Pawar (through V.C.) a/w Adv. Vaibhav Halake a/w Adv. Sairaj Surywanshi, for the applicant. Ms. Shubhangi Deshmukh, for the respondent – State. Adv. Mahalingam Pandharge (through V.C.) a/w Adv. Ajay Pareskar, for the respondent no.1. _________________________ CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J. DATED : OCTOBER 1, 2026 P.C.: 1. Both the counsels have tendered consent terms dated 1 October 2026. They submit that their respective parties have signed in their presence and they identify their signatures. Learned counsel for the parties state that they have explained to the signatories the contents of consent terms and the signatories have signed the consent terms after understanding the contents. Learned counsel for applicant state that all the signatories are also present in Court and they identify their respective clients. The consent terms are taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for identification. 2. For ease of reference, scanned copy of the Consent Terms is reproduced herein below:- 1/6 Rushi 30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc 2/6 Rushi 30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc 3/6 Rushi 30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc 4/6 Rushi 30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc 5/6 Rushi 30-REVN-52-2023-(CR).doc 3. All statements made in consent terms are accepted as undertaking made to this Court. All Statements are also accepted. 4. The Criminal Revision Application stands disposed of in terms of Consent Terms dated 1 October 2026. 5. By consent, in view of the Consent Terms entered into between the parties and duly signed by them, the amount of Rs.3,00,000/- deposited by the accused before the Judicial Magistrate First Class (J.M.F.C), Kolhapur, is allowed to be withdrawn by the complainant (Kiran Prakash Patil). 6. All parties to act on authenticated copy of this order. (RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) 6/6 Rushi