Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:19228
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3579 of 2026 1 - Smt. Lupatbai W/o Late Phulsingh, Aged About 68 Years R/o House No. 156, Rajiv Gandhi Ward No. -33, Shanti Nagar, Near House Of Parshad, Jagdalpur District -Bastar C.G.
--- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar New Raipur District Raipur C.G. 2 - The Chief Engineer, Public Works Department (B And R) Zone, Baster, Jagdalpur District -Baster C.G. 3 - The Executive Engineer Public Works Department ( B And R North Baster Division No.- 1, Jagdalpur District Bastar C.G.
-- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Chauhan, Advocate For Respondent-State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, P.L. SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice
Parth Prateem Sahu
Order On Board 27/04/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that husband of petitioner while working as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees died in harness, was entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioner. Identical issue came up for hearing before this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of C.G., in W.P.(S) No. 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioners have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN
2
2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner/s, he is having no objection.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record.
4. Taking into consideration, the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of permitting petitioner to submit fresh representation. In the event, petitioner submits representation, his claim shall be considered and decided in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation keeping in mind decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra).
5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observations and directions. C.C. as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram