2026:HHC:25820 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.634 of 2026 Decided on: 01 st July, 2026 ___________________________________________________________________ Anuradha and another ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and another ...Respondents _____________________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioners: Mr. Suneel Awasthi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has produced a copy of office order dated 30.06.2026, passed by Director School Education, Himachal Pradesh. The same is taken on record. 2. A perusal of the same reveals that the representations of the petitioners have been considered and rejected on the ground that the case of the petitioners are not 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 similarly situated to that of Sh. Mohit Sharma. 3. Since this Court in the judgment dated 19.12.2025, passed in CWP No.19953 of 2025, titled, Anuradha & Anr. vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and Anr., had only given the direction to consider and decide the representations of the petitioners (Annexure P-3 colly) in light of Mohit Sharma (supra), nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present execution petition and the same is accordingly disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law, to challenge the order dated 30.06.2026, passed by the Director School Education, Himachal Pradesh. 01 st July, 2026 ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) (ankit) Judge