927-ABA-2309-2026.ODT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2309 OF 2026 Amita Dharmendra Singh …Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent Adv. Waseem Pangarkar (Through V. C.) a/w Adv. Sachin Singh, Adv. Rohit Pitti i/b MZM Legal LLP, for the Applicant. Mr. Prasanna P. Malshe, A.P. P., for the Respondent – State. Mr. Sanjeev Kadam, Senior Advocate a/w Adv. Maitreye Shukla and Adv. Mayank Vira, for Intervenor/Original Complainant. Mr. Shreyas Oke, Authorised Representative of the Intervenor/ Original Complainant. CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J. DATE : 1ST OCTOBER 2026 P.C:- 1. Learned counsel for applicant as well as learned counsel for intervenor / Original Complainant submits that parties have settled the controversy and settlement-cum-Consent Terms have been signed by the complainant as well as applicant. 2. It is pointed out that the offence is registered on the basis of the report lodged by the Construction Company against its own Ex-employee alleging that he has completed certain sale transactions of customers by routing it through another broker and has sold parking slots. 1st October 2026 927-ABA-2309-2026.ODT 3. Pertinent to note, the applicant has earlier expressed readiness to resolve the controversy as was recorded in order dated 17th August 2026. Today, copy of the Consent Terms duly signed by the applicant and authorised representatives of the company along with their lawyers, is tendered across the bar and the same is taken on record and marked as Document ‘X’ for identification purpose. It is also pointed out that the applicant is present in the Court and representatives of the complainant is attending the matter through V. C. 4. Having regard to the fact that now the controversy is settled, the complainant conveys no objection for confirmation of the interim protection. 5. Hence, in view of this, since the controversy is settled, there is no question of any apprehension of arrest and the instant application needs to be allowed. 6. Hence, I pass following order :- ORDER (i) The Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed. (ii) In the event of arrest of this applicant in connection with Crime No. 921 of 2026 1st October 2026 927-ABA-2309-2026.ODT registered with Samata Nagar Police Station, Brihanmumbai, for the offence punishable under Sections 318(3), 336(3), 338, 340 read with 3(5) of The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, he be released on bail on furnishing P. R. Bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount. (iii) The applicant is directed to extend co-operation during investigation and trial. 7. Anticipatory Bail Application is disposed of in above terms. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) VDMokal/- 1st October 2026