Sunkari Ramulu (Died) per LRs A- 3AND4 v. Konem Ram ohana Rao
AS/533/2005 · 2026-10-07
Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13778 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 13778 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010368012005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE 8 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR APPEAL SUIT NO: 533 OF 2005 Between:
1. Sunkari Ramulu (Died) per LRs A R/o. Parvathipuram Municipal limits Vizianagaram
2. S.Bangaramma (died) per LRs A Ramulu R/o. Parvathipuram Municipal limits Vizianagaram
1. Konem Ram ohana Rao, S/o. Late NArayana R/o. Plot No. 301, Kurmannapalem Visakhapatnam Municipal Corp., Limits. aggrieved by the judgement and decree dated 01/04/2005 passed in Os.No. 21 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Parvathipuram present appeal is preferrred by the appellant IA NO: 1 OF 2005(ASMP 1647 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay of all further proceedings including passing of final decree in OS.No. 21 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, PArvathipuram dated 01/04/2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
THURSDAY, THE 8th DAY OF OCTOBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI APPEAL SUIT NO: 533 OF 2005 (Died) per LRs A- 3AND4, S/o. Late Appanna Cultivation R/o. Parvathipuram Municipal limits Vizianagaram
2. S.Bangaramma (died) per LRs A- 3&4 who are already on rec, W/o. Ramulu R/o. Parvathipuram Municipal limits Vizianagaram ...Petitioners AND Ram ohana Rao, S/o. Late NArayana R/o. Plot No. 301, Kurmannapalem Visakhapatnam Municipal Corp., Limits.
...Respondent aggrieved by the judgement and decree dated 01/04/2005 passed in Os.No. 21 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Parvathipuram present appeal is preferrred by the appellant IA NO: 1 OF 2005(ASMP 1647 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased ther proceedings including passing of final decree in OS.No. 21 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, PArvathipuram dated 01/04/2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR 3AND4, S/o. Late Appanna Cultivation 3&4 who are already on rec, W/o. ...Petitioners Ram ohana Rao, S/o. Late NArayana R/o. Plot No. 301, ...Respondent aggrieved by the judgement and decree dated 01/04/2005 passed in Os.No. 21 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Parvathipuram the Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased ther proceedings including passing of final decree in OS.No. 21 of 2004 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, PArvathipuram dated 01/04/2005
IA NO: 2 OF 2005(ASMP 2414 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interimorder dated 19.08.2005 amde in ASMP No.1647/2005 in AS NO.533/2005 IA NO: 6 OF 2005(XOBJ 21281 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2007(ASMP 2039 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To expedite the hearing and fix the date of hearing of above appeal AS.No.533/2005 in any near date in the month of October, 2007 and pass.
IA NO: 1 OF 2009(ASMP 1623 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to bring the LR's of the deceased sole respondent as respondents to 5 in the above appeal and may pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to deem fit and proper in the interests of justice and equity. IA NO: 1 OF 2010(ASMP 1070 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased bring the LR of the deceased of 1st appellant as appellants 3 and 4 in the above appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2012(ASMP 424 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased
condone the delay of 342 days in filing the petitioner to restore the appeal on the file of this Hon'ble Court IA NO: 1 OF 2013(ASMP 2399 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to record the LR's of the deceased 2nd appellant, as appellants 3 & 4 (who is already on record) in the above appeal and may pass IA NO: 2 OF 2013(ASMP 2400 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To restore the appeal no. 533/05, dt 22/2/11 on to the file of this Hon'ble Court and may pass IA NO: 1 OF 2017(ASMP 577 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased clarify that stay has been continuing in AS No.533/2005 as per orders in ASMP No.1647/2005 Counsel for the Petitioners: G VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent K B RAMANNA DORA The Court made the following order:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI APPEAL SUIT NO: 533 OF 2005
ORDER: Sri G. Vasantha Rayudu, learned counsel for the appellant, submits that the sole appellant has died and No Objection Certificate (NOC) was given long ago.
2. Sri K. B. Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the respondent, is present.
3. Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellant and the matter is not being prosecuted, the Appeal Suit is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution.
4. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order granted in the matter, if any, shall stand vacated. All pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI,J
Dated: 08.10.2026 KKV
57 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI
APPEAL SUIT NO: 533 OF 2005
Dated: 08.10.2026 KKV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI MAIN CASE No: APPEAL SUIT NO: 533 OF 2005 PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. No DATE
ORDER Office Note
08.10.2026 PKC, J
Appeal Suit is dismissed for non- prosecution. (vide separate order)
_________
PKC, J KKV